ARM templates VS AWS CloudFormation VS Terraform

ARM templates, AWS CloudFormation, and Terraform are all infrastructure as code (IaC) tools used to automate and manage cloud resources and infrastructure. They each have their own features and strengths, and the choice between them often depends on the cloud provider you are using (Azure for ARM templates, AWS for CloudFormation, and multi-cloud or other cloud providers for Terraform), as well as personal preferences and specific use cases. Here’s a comparison of these three IaC tools:

Azure Resource Manager (ARM) Templates:

Purpose: ARM templates are used for provisioning and managing resources in Microsoft Azure.
Language: ARM templates are written in JSON (JavaScript Object Notation).
Ecosystem: They are tightly integrated with Azure services and provide comprehensive support for Azure resources.
Extensibility: ARM templates can be extended using Azure PowerShell and Azure CLI.
Tooling: Azure DevOps and Visual Studio offer robust support for ARM templates.
Advantages: Close integration with Azure services, native support for Azure-specific features, and Azure Policy enforcement.
Limitations: Limited multi-cloud support; primarily focused on Microsoft Azure.

AWS CloudFormation:

Purpose: AWS CloudFormation is used to provision and manage AWS resources.
Language: CloudFormation templates are written in JSON or YAML.
Ecosystem: CloudFormation provides extensive coverage of AWS services and integrates well with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM).
Extensibility: AWS CloudFormation templates can be augmented using AWS Lambda for custom logic.
Tooling: AWS CloudFormation Designer, AWS CDK, and AWS Cloud Development Kit (CDK) provide additional tools and abstractions for working with CloudFormation.
Advantages: Native support for AWS services, strong integration with AWS Identity and Access Management, and extensive AWS-specific resources.
Limitations: Primarily focused on AWS; limited support for non-AWS resources.


Purpose: Terraform is a multi-cloud IaC tool that can be used to provision and manage resources across various cloud providers and on-premises infrastructure.
Language: HashiCorp Configuration Language (HCL) is used for writing Terraform code.
Ecosystem: Terraform has a broad and growing ecosystem of providers, supporting multiple cloud providers and third-party services.
Extensibility: Terraform allows for custom modules and extensions.
Tooling: Terraform provides a powerful command-line interface and has a rich ecosystem of plugins and integrations.
Advantages: Multi-cloud support, a vast ecosystem of providers, and a flexible and extensible approach to IaC.
Limitations: Not as tightly integrated with specific cloud services as native IaC tools.

Choosing between these tools depends on the specific cloud environment, the scope of infrastructure, and team’s expertise. If locked into a single cloud provider, using the native IaC tool (ARM for Azure, CloudFormation for AWS) can be a good choice. If need to manage resources across multiple cloud providers, Terraform may be a better fit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *